Judicial Activism Supreme Court Cases

Reading Time: 6 minutes

The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land. It is a document that outlines the structure of the federal government and the rights of its citizens. The Constitution has been amended 27 times, and has been interpreted and applied by the Supreme Court in thousands of cases.

Since its creation, the Supreme Court has played a vital role in safeguarding the Constitution and the rights of Americans. The Court has been called to interpret the Constitution in times of great national crisis, such as the Civil War and the Great Depression.

The role of the Supreme Court has also changed over time. In the early years of the United States, the Court was largely a passive institution, deferring to the decisions of the other branches of government. In the late 19th century, the Supreme Court began to assume a more active role, striking down laws that violated the Constitution. This period came to be known as the era of judicial activism.

In recent years, the Supreme Court has once again become a more passive institution, deferring to the decisions of the other branches of government. However, the Court has not been shy about striking down laws that violate the Constitution, a process known as judicial review.

The Supreme Court is often called upon to rule on cases that involve important constitutional questions. In these cases, the Court is required to interpret the Constitution and apply it to the facts of the case.

The most important cases are decided by a majority of the nine justices on the Supreme Court. These cases are known as landmark cases.

The following are some of the most important Supreme Court cases involving judicial activism.

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

In this case, the Supreme Court established the principle of judicial review, which allows the Court to strike down laws that violate the Constitution.

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution allows the federal government to exercise authority over matters that are not expressly mentioned in the Constitution.

Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857)

In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that slaves and their descendants were not citizens of the United States.

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protects freedom of speech, even if that speech is unpopular or dangerous.

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that segregation in public schools is unconstitutional.

Roe v. Wade (1973)

In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution guarantees a woman’s right to an abortion.

Bush v. Gore (2000)

In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution allows the recount of votes in a presidential election to be stopped.

What court case is an example of judicial activism?

One of the most well-known examples of judicial activism is the Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade. This case involved a pregnant woman named Norma McCorvey who sought to have an abortion. The Supreme Court ruled in her favor, stating that a woman has a right to an abortion under the 14th Amendment. This case is an example of judicial activism because the Supreme Court justices essentially rewrote the law to suit their own agenda.

Was Roe v Wade judicial activism?

In 1973, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Roe v. Wade, which held that the right to privacy under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment extended to a woman’s decision to have an abortion. The decision has been controversial ever since, with opponents of abortion arguing that it was an act of judicial activism.

There are a few different arguments that can be made in favor of the idea that Roe v. Wade was an act of judicial activism. The first is that the decision was based on a faulty interpretation of the Constitution. The right to privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, and so the Court relied on the Doctrine of Incorporation to extend it to abortion. This argument has been criticized by scholars, who argue that the Court should not have used this doctrine to expand rights, as it is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.

Another argument is that the Court did not properly take into account the views of the people who would be affected by the decision. In Roe v. Wade, the Court held that the right to privacy extended to a woman’s decision to have an abortion, even in the early stages of pregnancy. This decision was controversial, and it was not clear that a majority of the population agreed with it. The Court should have taken this into account when making its decision.

Finally, some people argue that Roe v. Wade was an act of judicial activism because it overturned a law that was passed by the democratically-elected legislature. The law in question was the Texas Abortion Law, which prohibited abortions except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. The Court should not have overturned this law without first considering the views of the people who passed it.

Despite these arguments, there are also arguments in favor of Roe v. Wade that suggest it was not an act of judicial activism. The first is that the decision was based on well-established legal principles. The right to privacy was first recognized in the Supreme Court’s decision in Griswold v. Connecticut, and the Court had also upheld the right to abortion in previous cases.

Another argument is that the Court was acting in line with public opinion. A majority of the population did support the right to abortion at the time that Roe v. Wade was decided. Finally, some people argue that the Court was simply exercising its role as a protector of constitutional rights. The Constitution guarantees the right to privacy, and the Court was simply upholding this right.

In the end, it is difficult to say definitively whether Roe v. Wade was an act of judicial activism. Each argument has its own strengths and weaknesses, and it is up to each individual to decide which argument they believe is persuasive.

Is Marbury v Madison judicial activism?

In 1803, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Marbury v. Madison. The decision has been hailed as a landmark of judicial activism, as it asserted the power of the Court to review and strike down acts of Congress that were contrary to the Constitution.

The case arose from a dispute between William Marbury, a commissioner of the peace appointed by President John Adams, and James Madison, the Secretary of State. Marbury sought to compel Madison to deliver a commission that had been issued to him by Adams, but Madison refused.

Marbury then brought suit in the Supreme Court, arguing that he had a right to the commission and that Madison had violated the Constitution by refusing to deliver it. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled in favor of Marbury.

Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for the majority, held that the Constitution granted the Court the power to review and invalidate acts of Congress that were contrary to the Constitution. He also held that the Court could not compel Madison to deliver the commission, but that Marbury could seek relief from Congress.

The decision in Marbury v. Madison has been hailed as a landmark of judicial activism, as it asserted the power of the Court to review and strike down acts of Congress that were contrary to the Constitution. Some have argued, however, that the decision was not actually a landmark of judicial activism, but rather a reaffirmation of the power of the judiciary that had been established in the cases of Chisholm v. Georgia and McCulloch v. Maryland.

What Supreme Court case is an example of judicial restraint?

What is judicial restraint?

Which was the first case of judicial activism in India?

In India, judicial activism is the act of the judiciary in which they use their powers to influence the government and society. Judicial activism can be seen as a way to protect the rights of citizens.

The first case of judicial activism in India was the case of Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh. In this case, the Supreme Court of India ruled that the government could not violate the privacy of citizens without a warrant. This case was important in establishing the principle of judicial review in India.

Which is an example of judicial activism quizlet?

Quizlet is an online learning platform with a variety of tools and resources for students of all ages. It offers flashcards, games, and quizzes to help students learn and review material.

One of the features of Quizlet is the ability to search for specific terms and topics. This can be helpful when studying for a test or trying to learn a new subject.

In addition, Quizlet offers users the ability to create their own flashcards, games, and quizzes. This can be a great way to learn material, as you can tailor the activities to your own needs and interests.

Quizlet is free to use and does not require any registration.

Why is it called Roe v Wade?

In 1973, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Roe v. Wade, which recognized a constitutional right to abortion. The decision was named for Norma McCorvey, who was known as “Jane Roe” in the case.

The lawsuit was brought by McCorvey and two other women, who sought to overturn a Texas law that criminalized abortion. The women argued that the law violated their constitutional rights to privacy and liberty.

In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court agreed. The Court held that the right to privacy includes the right to choose whether to have an abortion. The Court also held that the right to liberty includes the right to make that choice without interference from the government.

Judicial Activism Supreme Court Cases9 min read