Legal Defense Fund Standing Rock

Reading Time: 7 minutes

What is the legal defense fund for Standing Rock?

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe established a legal defense fund in early December 2016 to help people who were arrested while protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline. The fund will help people pay for legal fees and related costs.

Who can apply for help from the fund?

People who have been arrested and charged with a crime related to their participation in the protests at Standing Rock can apply for help from the fund.

How much money is available to help people?

The fund has raised over $1 million so far. The amount of money available to help people will depend on how many people apply for assistance and how much money is needed to cover their legal costs.

What kinds of expenses will the fund help people pay for?

The fund will help people pay for legal fees, bail, court costs, and travel expenses related to their case.

How can people apply for help from the fund?

People can apply for help from the fund by completing an application form and sending it to the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.

Table of Contents

Why did the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe sue the US Army Corps?

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe filed a lawsuit against the US Army Corps of Engineers on July 27th, 2016. The tribe argued that the Army Corps violated the Clean Water Act by approving the Dakota Access Pipeline without properly consulting the tribe. The tribe also claimed that the pipeline would damage sacred sites and contaminate the tribe’s water supply.

The Army Corps responded to the lawsuit by arguing that they had properly consulted with the tribe and that the pipeline would not damage sacred sites or contaminate the tribe’s water supply. The tribe also argued that the Army Corps had violated the National Historic Preservation Act, but the Army Corps argued that they were exempt from the act.

The lawsuit went to trial in February of 2017. The tribe presented evidence that the Army Corps had not properly consulted with them and that the pipeline would damage sacred sites and contaminate the tribe’s water supply. The Army Corps argued that they had consulted with the tribe and that the pipeline would not damage sacred sites or contaminate the tribe’s water supply.

The judge ruled in favor of the tribe in late April of 2017. The judge ruled that the Army Corps had violated the Clean Water Act and the National Historic Preservation Act and that the tribe could proceed with their lawsuit. The Army Corps has filed an appeal, but the ruling is still in effect.

The Dakota Access Pipeline is a $3.8 billion project that would transport crude oil from the Bakken oil fields in North Dakota to refineries in Illinois. The pipeline would cross under the Missouri River, which is the main source of water for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. The tribe argues that the pipeline could contaminate their water supply and damage sacred sites.

The Army Corps argues that they consulted with the tribe and that the pipeline would not damage sacred sites or contaminate the tribe’s water supply. The tribe presented evidence at trial that the Army Corps had not properly consulted with them and that the pipeline would damage sacred sites and contaminate the tribe’s water supply. The judge ruled in favor of the tribe and the Army Corps has filed an appeal.

What is happening with Standing Rock?

Since April 2016, protesters have been occupying the Standing Rock Indian Reservation in North Dakota to prevent the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. The $3.8 billion project would transport oil from the Bakken Formation in North Dakota to refineries in Illinois, crossing under the Standing Rock Sioux Nation and the 17 million people that rely on the Missouri River for drinking, irrigation, and energy.

The protests, led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, have been met with intense police repression. In response to peaceful protests and prayer ceremonies, law enforcement has used mace, rubber bullets, water cannons, and concussion grenades, injuring hundreds and arresting more than 700 people. On November 20, 2016, a video emerged of law enforcement officers using a water cannon on protesters in 26-degree weather, resulting in several cases of hypothermia.

In December, the Army Corps of Engineers announced that it would not grant an easement for the pipeline to cross under the Standing Rock Sioux Nation, but the Trump Administration has since reversed that decision. The protests are ongoing.

Is the Dakota Access Pipeline legal?

The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) has been a source of significant controversy in the United States in recent months. The 1,172-mile long pipeline, which is slated to transport crude oil from the Bakken shale formation in North Dakota to a terminal in Illinois, has been met with significant opposition from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, as well as environmental activists, who argue that the pipeline could damage sacred sites and contaminate the tribe’s water supply.

The legality of the DAPL has been called into question, with some arguing that the Army Corps of Engineers failed to properly consult with the tribe before approving the project. However, the Army Corps has argued that it did in fact consult with the tribe, and that the project was approved in accordance with standard permitting procedures.

In late December, the Obama administration announced that it would not allow the DAPL to cross under the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s water supply, but the Trump administration later overturned that decision, allowing the project to proceed.

So, is the Dakota Access Pipeline legal?

The short answer is yes. The DAPL was approved in accordance with standard permitting procedures, and the Army Corps of Engineers has argued that it did in fact consult with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe before approving the project.

What is the Dakota Access Pipeline controversy?

The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) is a 1,172-mile crude oil pipeline project that will cross North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois. The pipeline will carry up to 570,000 barrels of oil per day from the Bakken and Three Forks production areas in North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois.

The DAPL has faced significant opposition from environmental and Native American groups, who argue that the pipeline could damage sacred sites and contaminate water supplies. In September 2016, the Obama administration announced that it was delaying construction of the DAPL in order to conduct a more thorough environmental review.

In February 2017, the Trump administration reversed this decision and granted final approval for the DAPL. Construction of the pipeline began shortly thereafter.

Does the Keystone pipeline go through Native American land?

In November of 2011, the Keystone XL pipeline was proposed to transport tar sands oil from Alberta, Canada to the Gulf Coast of Texas. The proposed pipeline would cross through six states, including over 1,700 miles of land that is owned or managed by Native Americans. The proposed pipeline has sparked major concern among many Native American tribes, who worry about the potential for oil spills and the impact the pipeline could have on their lands and communities.

The proposed Keystone XL pipeline would cross under the Standing Rock Sioux Nation in North Dakota, the Rosebud Sioux Nation in South Dakota, and the Cheyenne River Sioux Nation in South Dakota. The proposed pipeline would also cross the Ogallala Aquifer, which is the largest freshwater aquifer in the United States and supplies water to millions of people in the Midwest. The Ogallala Aquifer is also the primary source of water for the Great Plains tribes, many of which are already facing water shortages.

Native American tribes have been fighting the proposed Keystone XL pipeline for years. In February of 2016, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, arguing that the Corps had failed to properly consult with the tribe about the proposed pipeline. The lawsuit was later dismissed.

In December of 2016, the Army Corps of Engineers announced that it would not grant an easement for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline to cross under the Standing Rock Sioux Nation. The Corps said that it would explore alternate routes for the pipeline. However, in January of 2017, President Donald Trump issued an executive order calling for the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline.

The fate of the Keystone XL pipeline is still undecided, but the tribes affected by the proposed pipeline continue to fight against it.Native American tribes have been fighting the proposed Keystone XL pipeline for years. In February of 2016, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, arguing that the Corps had failed to properly consult with the tribe about the proposed pipeline. The lawsuit was later dismissed.

The fate of the Keystone XL pipeline is still undecided, but the tribes affected by the proposed pipeline continue to fight against it.

Is Dakota pipeline shutting down?

Is the Dakota pipeline shutting down?

Reports surfaced on Tuesday that the Dakota Access Pipeline could be shut down as early as Wednesday, although the company behind the project has denied the reports.

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and its supporters have been fighting the $3.8 billion project for months, arguing that it would threaten the water supply and damage sacred sites.

In early December, the Army Corps of Engineers denied a key permit for the project, but the company behind it, Energy Transfer Partners, said it would continue construction.

The tribe has called for a “total shutdown” of the pipeline.

Energy Transfer Partners has not yet responded to a request for comment.

Is the Dakota Access Pipeline finished?

The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) is a crude oil pipeline that is currently under construction in the United States. The pipeline will transport crude oil from the Bakken Formation in North Dakota to Patoka, Illinois, and then connect to the Gulf of Mexico. The DAPL has been the source of protests and conflict for many months, with opponents arguing that the pipeline poses a threat to the environment and to the water resources of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.

In December of 2016, the Army Corps of Engineers denied a permit for the DAPL to cross under the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s water source, the Missouri River. The Corps argued that the DAPL would impact the tribe’s religious ceremonies and cultural heritage. However, on February 8, 2017, President Donald Trump issued an executive order that reversed the Corps’ decision, allowing the DAPL to be completed.

Construction of the DAPL has continued in spite of the protests, and the pipeline is now nearly complete. The only remaining section of the pipeline that needs to be completed is the section that crosses under the Missouri River. Construction of this section has been delayed due to the protests, but it is expected to be completed in the near future.

So is the DAPL finished? Yes, the pipeline is now almost complete, and the only section that remains to be completed is the section that crosses under the Missouri River. Construction of this section has been delayed due to the protests, but it is expected to be completed in the near future.

Legal Defense Fund Standing Rock10 min read