Distinguishing Between Legal And Equitable Remedies Is9 min read
When you’re faced with a situation that requires a remedy, it’s important to understand the difference between legal and equitable remedies.
A legal remedy is a response to a legal wrong. It’s a way to enforce your legal rights and to punish the person who has wronged you. There are a number of different legal remedies, including damages, injunction, and restitution.
An equitable remedy, on the other hand, is a response to a wrong that is not strictly legal. It’s a way to right a wrong that is not covered by the law. Equitable remedies include specific performance, injunction, and rescission.
The key difference between legal and equitable remedies is that legal remedies are available only to those who have a legal right, while equitable remedies are available to anyone who has been wronged.
Which remedy you choose depends on the facts of your case. If you have a legal right and the other party has violated that right, you should seek a legal remedy. If you have been wronged but don’t have a legal right, you should seek an equitable remedy.
It’s important to understand the difference between legal and equitable remedies, because the wrong remedy can do more harm than good. If you’re not sure which remedy to seek, you should speak to a lawyer.
Table of Contents
What is the difference between a legal and equitable remedy quizlet?
What is the difference between a legal and equitable remedy quizlet?
A legal remedy is a court order or judgment that requires a party to do or not do something. An equitable remedy is a court order or judgment that requires a party to pay money or to transfer property to another party.
What are the differences between legal and equitable remedies choose 2 answer choices?
Legal and equitable remedies are two different types of remedies that can be awarded to a plaintiff in a lawsuit. A legal remedy is a remedy that is provided for under the law, while an equitable remedy is a remedy that is provided for under equity. There are a number of differences between legal and equitable remedies, including the following:
1. Legal remedies are available only if they are provided for under the law, while equitable remedies are available even if they are not provided for under the law.
2. Legal remedies are awarded to the plaintiff based on the rights that the plaintiff has under the law, while equitable remedies are awarded to the plaintiff based on the equity of the situation.
3. Legal remedies are available only in certain types of cases, while equitable remedies are available in any type of case.
4. Legal remedies are awarded by a court, while equitable remedies are awarded by a judge.
5. Legal remedies are usually monetary, while equitable remedies can be either monetary or non-monetary.
6. Legal remedies are available only from the court system, while equitable remedies are available from both the court system and private parties.
7. Legal remedies are available only to individuals, while equitable remedies are available to both individuals and businesses.
8. Legal remedies are available only in civil lawsuits, while equitable remedies are available in both civil and criminal lawsuits.
9. Legal remedies are available only to individuals who have been injured, while equitable remedies are available to both individuals who have been injured and individuals who have not been injured.
10. Legal remedies are available only in a limited number of areas, while equitable remedies are available in all areas of the law.
What are the 3 equitable remedies?
In law, an equitable remedy is a form of relief that is granted by a court in response to an equitable cause of action. There are three main types of equitable remedies: specific performance, injunction, and rescission.
Specific performance is an order from the court requiring a party to carry out their obligations under a contract. Injunctions are orders from the court prohibiting a party from doing something that would cause harm to another party. Rescission is the undoing of a contract, returning the parties to their original positions.
Each of these remedies is granted at the discretion of the court, depending on the circumstances of the case. For example, the court may decide that an injunction is the most appropriate remedy to protect the interests of the plaintiff, or that rescission is the most appropriate remedy to remedy the harm caused by the breach of contract.
The availability of equitable remedies is one of the key features that distinguishes equity from law. Equity is a branch of law that allows the court to provide relief that is not available at law. This includes remedies that are tailored to the specific circumstances of the case, such as specific performance and injunction.
The three main equitable remedies are specific performance, injunction, and rescission. These remedies are available at the discretion of the court, depending on the circumstances of the case.
What is considered an equitable remedy?
An equitable remedy is a legal action taken to right a wrong or enforce a right that is not available through a typical lawsuit. This can include ordering someone to do something (such as perform a specific action or stop doing something), awarding damages, or issuing an injunction.
Equitable remedies are often used in situations where the traditional legal remedies would not be effective. For example, when a contract has been breached, the traditional legal remedy would be to sue for damages. However, in cases where the breach has caused significant harm, an injunction may be issued instead to order the party that breached the contract to stop the harmful behavior.
Equitable remedies are also used to prevent someone from taking an action that would cause harm. For example, if someone was about to sell property that they know is contaminated, an injunction could be issued to prevent the sale from going through.
While equitable remedies are available in many situations, they are not available in all cases. To be eligible for an equitable remedy, you must show that you have been harmed in some way and that the traditional legal remedies would not be effective in fixing the problem.
Which of the following is an equitable remedy for breach of contract quizlet?
Which of the following is an equitable remedy for breach of contract quizlet?
There are several different types of remedies that can be awarded to a party who has been wronged by a breach of contract. The most common are damages, specific performance, and injunction.
Damages are a monetary award that is intended to compensate the injured party for the losses they suffered as a result of the breach. This can include the costs of repairing any damage done, the value of any lost profits, and the costs of bringing a lawsuit.
Specific performance is an order from the court requiring the breaching party to do what they promised in the contract. This is usually only granted if damages would not be an adequate remedy, for example if the contract involves the sale of a unique item.
Injunction is a court order that prohibits the breaching party from doing anything that would injure the other party. This can be used to stop them from performing the breach, or from taking any action that would make it difficult or impossible to enforce the contract.
Which of the following is an equitable remedy for breach of contract?
When a party breaches a contract, the non-breaching party may be entitled to one or more equitable remedies. Equitable remedies are remedies that are not available at law, but rather are available only in equity. There are a number of different equitable remedies that may be available to a non-breaching party, but the most common are specific performance and injunction.
Specific performance is a remedy that orders the breaching party to perform the contract exactly as it was agreed to. Injunctions are orders from the court that prohibit the breaching party from taking certain actions that would interfere with the other party’s ability to perform the contract. Injunctive relief is often sought in cases where the breaching party has destroyed or threatened to destroy the subject matter of the contract.
The availability of equitable remedies depends on the facts of each case. A party seeking equitable remedies must show that they are entitled to them and that the other party will be harmed if they are not granted. Equitable remedies are not always available, and the court has discretion to decide whether to grant them.
Which of the following is an equitable remedy for breach of contract?
There are a number of different equitable remedies that may be available to a non-breaching party, but the most common are specific performance and injunction.
What is the difference between legal and equitable?
When most people think of the words “legal” and “equitable,” they think of two different concepts. However, the two terms are actually quite related. The main difference between legal and equitable is that legal is based on the law, while equitable is based on fairness.
Legal is based on the law. This means that legal is mandatory and must be followed. If you break the law, you will be punished. Equitable is based on fairness. This means that equitable is not mandatory, and people are not punished for not following it. Instead, equitable is based on what is fair and reasonable.
Another difference between legal and equitable is that legal is available to everyone, while equitable is only available to certain people. Legal is available to everyone because it is based on the law. This means that everyone is subject to the law, and everyone has the same rights and obligations. Equitable is only available to certain people because it is based on fairness. This means that the people who are affected by the equitable decision will have to agree to it.
The final difference between legal and equitable is that legal is retrospective, while equitable is prospective. This means that legal is based on what has already happened, while equitable is based on what will happen in the future. This is why equitable is not mandatory – because the people who will be affected by it have not yet agreed to it.
Overall, the main difference between legal and equitable is that legal is based on the law, while equitable is based on fairness. legal is available to everyone, while equitable is only available to certain people. legal is retrospective, while equitable is prospective.
