Judicial Retention Utah 2018

Reading Time: 4 minutes

In Utah, judicial retention elections are held every six years in order to allow voters to decide whether or not to retain the state’s appellate court judges. The next such election is scheduled for November 6, 2018.

Utah’s judicial retention election process is unique in that it is the only state in which the voters are asked to decide whether or not to retain every sitting appellate court judge in the state. In most other states, appellate court judges are either appointed by the governor or elected by the public, and they serve until they choose to retire or are removed from office.

There are six appellate court judges in Utah who are up for retention in November 2018. These judges are:

1st District: Paul M. Dame

2nd District: Douglas S. Thompson

3rd District: Jill P. Parrish

4th District: David N. Mortensen

5th District: Richard C. Sanders

6th District: Jill M. Durrant

The judges who are seeking retention must receive a majority of the votes in order to be retained. If a majority of voters do not vote to retain a judge, that judge is automatically removed from office.

To date, no Utah appellate court judge has ever been voted out of office. However, the vote to retain or remove judges is always a close one, and it is important that voters take the time to learn about each judge before making a decision.

The Utah Bar Association provides an in-depth evaluation of each judge seeking retention, which can be found on the Utah Bar Association website. This evaluation includes biographical information, a list of the judge’s judicial opinions, and a summary of the pros and cons of retaining the judge.

What does court retention mean?

When a company is said to have court retention, it usually means that the company is in the process of being wound up. The company will have to go through the court in order to do this, and the court will decide whether or not the company is to be dissolved. In some cases, the court may appoint a liquidator in order to oversee the dissolution of the company. This can be a lengthy and expensive process, so it is important to seek legal advice if your company is in this situation.

How often are judges elected in Utah?

Judges in Utah are elected for six year terms. The number of terms a judge may serve is unlimited.

Judges in Utah are nominated by the Judicial Council. The nominees are then sent to the Governor who may choose to appoint one of the nominees, or may chose someone else.

If there is a vacancy on the bench, the Governor may appoint someone to fill the vacancy until the next election.

Candidates for judge in Utah must be at least 30 years old, have been a resident of the state for at least five years, and be a member of the bar in good standing.

How many judges are in Utah?

Utah has a total of 15 judges. There are 9 district court judges, 3 juvenile court judges, 1 probate judge, and 1 tax court judge.

How many judges are on the Utah court of Appeals?

There are six judges on the Utah court of Appeals.

When would a judge have to run in a retention election quizlet?

A judge in the United States would have to run in a retention election if they were appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.

What does the term judicial review mean?

Judicial review is a process where a court reviews the decisions or actions of a government body to determine whether they are lawful. It is a way for the courts to ensure that the government is acting within its power and that the individual’s rights are being protected.

The process of judicial review can be used to challenge both the decisions of government bodies and the actions of government officials. For example, a person might challenge a decision to revoke their passport by arguing that it was made outside of the government’s power. Or they might challenge the actions of a police officer who has arrested them, arguing that the officer acted unlawfully.

The power of judicial review is granted to the courts by the Constitution of most countries. This power is often referred to as the “nuclear option” because it can be used to invalidate the decisions of government bodies and officials.

What is the biggest problem currently facing courts?

There are a number of different issues that courts are currently grappling with. One of the biggest problems is the increasing caseloads, as well as the shortage of judges and court staff. This has led to a number of delays in hearing cases, and in some instances, cases have been postponed or dropped altogether.

Another issue that courts are dealing with is the growing number of self-represented litigants. This is particularly a problem in family law cases, where people often have to represent themselves without legal representation. This can lead to cases taking longer to resolve, and can be costly for both the parties involved and the court system as a whole.

Finally, courts are also struggling with the issue of cybercrime. This is a particularly difficult problem to tackle, as the technology is constantly evolving and the perpetrators are often difficult to track down. This has led to a number of cases taking longer to resolve, and in some instances, the perpetrators have been able to get away with their crimes.

Judicial Retention Utah 20185 min read