Should Legal Drinking Age Be Lowered11 min read

Reading Time: 8 minutes

There is a large debate across the United States about whether the legal drinking age should be lowered from 21 to 18. Those who are in favor of the change believe that 18 is the age of majority in the United States, and people should be able to make their own decisions about alcohol at that age. They also argue that if someone is old enough to vote, serve in the military, and buy cigarettes, they should be able to drink alcohol.

Those who are opposed to the change argue that alcohol can be harmful to developing brains, and that the age limit should stay at 21 in order to protect young people. They also say that if the legal drinking age is lowered, it will be more difficult to enforce laws against underage drinking, and that it will be more difficult to teach young people about the dangers of alcohol.

There is no easy answer when it comes to this debate. Those in favor of the change make valid points, but there is evidence that alcohol can be harmful to young people. Those who are opposed to the change make valid points as well, and it is important to consider all of the potential implications of lowering the drinking age.

Ultimately, it is up to each individual state to decide whether the legal drinking age should be lowered. Some states have already lowered the drinking age, while others have not. It will be interesting to see what happens in the coming years, as the debate about this issue continues to heat up.

Why should the legal drinking age be lowered?

The legal drinking age should be lowered because it is proven that the brain is not fully developed until age 25. This means that young adults are more likely to make bad decisions when under the influence of alcohol. Another reason the legal drinking age should be lowered is because it is hypocritical. The legal drinking age is 21 in the United States, but 18 year olds can vote and join the military.

One reason the legal drinking age should be lowered is because the brain is not fully developed until age 25. This means that young adults are more likely to make bad decisions when under the influence of alcohol. For example, they may be more likely to drive drunk or engage in risky behavior. Lowering the drinking age would allow young adults to drink in a more controlled setting, such as a bar or restaurant. This would allow them to learn how to drink responsibly.

Another reason the legal drinking age should be lowered is because it is hypocritical. The legal drinking age is 21 in the United States, but 18 year olds can vote and join the military. In other words, the government trusts 18 year olds to make important decisions about the country, but they don’t trust them to drink alcohol. This doesn’t make sense.

Finally, lowering the drinking age would be good for the economy. Bars and restaurants would make more money, and tax revenue would increase. This would help to create jobs and stimulate the economy.

In conclusion, there are several good reasons why the legal drinking age should be lowered. The brain is not fully developed until age 25, it is hypocritical, and it would be good for the economy. I hope that the government will consider lowering the drinking age in the near future.

Why Should drinking age be lowered 18?

The drinking age in the United States should be lowered from 21 to 18 years old because it is unconstitutional, impractical, and hypocritical.

The Twenty-First Amendment to the United States Constitution repealed the Eighteenth Amendment and returned the power to regulate alcohol to the states. According to the amendment, “the transportation or importation into any state, territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited.” In other words, the states have the right to make their own laws governing alcohol, as long as they do not violate the Constitution.

Lowering the drinking age to 18 would bring the United States into compliance with the United Nations’ 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child, which the United States has signed. The convention states that “the child shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of the child’s choice.”

The practicality of enforcing the drinking age of 21 is difficult, if not impossible. It is impossible to determine whether or not a person is 21 years old. There are many ways to circumvent the law, such as using false identification.

Lowering the drinking age to 18 would bring the United States into compliance with the Interstate Driver’s License Compact. The compact is an agreement between states that allows driver’s license information to be shared. This would make it easier to enforce the drinking age of 21, as it would be easier to determine whether or not a person is of legal drinking age.

The hypocrisy of the drinking age of 21 is that it is legal to serve alcohol to a person who is 18 years old, but it is illegal for that person to drink it. This is known as the “doubling of the drinking age.”

The drinking age should be lowered to 18 years old because it is unconstitutional, impractical, and hypocritical.

Should the alcohol age be lowered?

The debate over whether the legal drinking age should be lowered has been a contentious issue for many years. On one side of the argument, those who support lowering the age believe that by doing so, it will help to reduce alcohol-related fatalities and injuries. On the other side, those who oppose lowering the drinking age argue that it will lead to more alcohol-related problems, such as drunk driving and alcohol abuse.

There are a number of factors to consider when deciding whether or not to lower the drinking age. First, it is important to look at the statistics related to alcohol-related fatalities and injuries. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), each year, approximately 6,000 people die from alcohol-related causes, and approximately 2.3 million people are injured. Of those injured, approximately 50,000 are hospitalized and 1,000 die. These numbers are significant, and it is important to consider them when making a decision about the drinking age.

Another factor to consider is the age at which people are able to legally drink in other countries. In most European countries, the legal drinking age is lower than it is in the United States. For example, in Spain the drinking age is 18, in France it is 16, and in Italy it is 14. Interestingly, the rate of alcohol-related fatalities and injuries is lower in European countries than it is in the United States. This suggests that lowering the drinking age may not have the negative consequences that many people fear.

Finally, it is important to consider the views of young people on the drinking age. A recent survey by the Harvard School of Public Health found that the majority of young people do not believe that the drinking age should be increased, and that most believe that it should be lowered. This suggests that there is support for lowering the drinking age among young people.

In conclusion, there are a number of factors to consider when deciding whether or not to lower the drinking age. Although there are risks associated with lowering the age, there are also risks associated with keeping it at 21. Ultimately, it is up to individual states to decide what the drinking age should be.

How does lowering the drinking age help the economy?

There is a longstanding debate in the United States about the drinking age. Some people argue that the drinking age should be lowered to 18 in order to help the economy. Others argue that the drinking age should remain at 21 in order to keep people safe. This article will explore both sides of the argument and try to come to a conclusion.

When it comes to the economy, there are a few potential benefits to lowering the drinking age. For one, young people would be able to spend more money on alcohol, which would help retailers and bar and restaurant owners. Additionally, young people would be able to work more hours if they were not required to wait until 21 to drink. This would give them more money to spend on other things, which would also help the economy.

However, there are also some potential risks associated with lowering the drinking age. For one, alcohol can be dangerous, and young people may not be able to handle it responsibly. Additionally, it is possible that more people would drink and drive if the drinking age was lowered, which could lead to more accidents and fatalities.

Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide whether or not the potential benefits of lowering the drinking age outweigh the potential risks. However, it is important to consider all of the potential consequences before making a decision.

Why is the drinking age so high?

There are many reasons why the drinking age is 21 in the United States. One of the reasons is that the legal drinking age is intended to protect young people from the dangers of drinking. The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) reports that alcohol is the drug most often abused by young people in the United States. About 90% of all alcohol consumed by youths under the age of 21 is in the form of binge drinking.

Binge drinking is defined as consuming four or more drinks for women and five or more drinks for men within a two-hour period. This kind of drinking can lead to car crashes, violence, alcohol poisoning, and other health problems. Young people who drink heavily are also more likely to perform poorly in school, engage in risky sexual behavior, and suffer from mental health problems.

Another reason for the legal drinking age of 21 is that the brain is still developing until about age 25. Alcohol can interfere with the development of the brain, particularly the areas of the brain that control judgment, decision-making, and coordination.

The NIAAA also reports that people who start drinking alcohol before the age of 15 are four times more likely to develop alcohol dependence than those who start drinking at age 21 or older.

So, while there are some risks associated with drinking alcohol, these risks are greater for young people. The legal drinking age of 21 is intended to protect them from the dangers of alcohol abuse.

What is the lowest drinking age in the world?

There is no definitive answer to this question as different countries have different minimum drinking ages. However, according to the World Health Organisation, the lowest minimum drinking age in the world is in Andorra, where the age is just 16.

In many countries, the legal drinking age is 18. However, there are a number of countries where the age is lower. In Moldova, for example, the minimum drinking age is just 16. And in a number of countries in the Middle East, the age is just 18.

There are a number of reasons for the variation in minimum drinking ages around the world. In some cases, it is due to cultural differences. In other cases, it is due to the fact that different countries have different approaches to alcohol.

Whatever the reasons, it is important to remember that the minimum drinking age is just that: the minimum. In most countries, the age at which it is legal to purchase and consume alcohol is higher. In the United States, for example, the minimum drinking age is 21, but the age at which it is legal to purchase alcohol is 18.

So, while the minimum drinking age is lower in some countries, the age at which it is legal to purchase and consume alcohol is often higher.

Does a lower drinking age mean safer consumption?

In 1984, the United States government passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act, which made it illegal for states to sell or provide alcohol to anyone under the age of 21. This law has been hotly debated for years, with some arguing that it’s helped to reduce alcohol-related accidents and deaths, while others claim that it has actually done more harm than good.

One of the main arguments for keeping the drinking age at 21 is that it reduces alcohol-related accidents and deaths. It’s been shown that young adults are more likely to binge drink or drive under the influence when the drinking age is lower. This is likely because they feel like they’re “above the law” and can’t be punished for breaking it.

However, there are also a number of drawbacks to the current drinking age. For starters, it’s often difficult for young adults to get their hands on alcohol, which can lead to dangerous behaviors such as binge drinking. Additionally, many young adults turn to dangerous methods of obtaining alcohol, such as buying it from older people or getting it from bootleggers.

Finally, some experts argue that the age limit isn’t realistic. Young adults have been drinking for centuries, and it’s not going to stop just because the law says so. In fact, by making it illegal to drink under the age of 21, we could be doing more harm than good.

So, what’s the right answer? There’s no easy answer, and it likely depends on your point of view. However, it’s important to consider all of the pros and cons before making a decision.