What Are Legal Precedents

Reading Time: 7 minutes

A legal precedent is a judicial decision that sets a legal principle for future cases to follow. When a court hands down a ruling in a case, that ruling becomes a legal precedent that future courts can cite in their decisions.

Precedents can be created in any type of court case, from criminal to civil to family law. They can be created at the state or federal level, and they can be binding or non-binding.

Binding precedents are those that must be followed by future courts in the same jurisdiction. Non-binding precedents are those that are not binding, but may be persuasive to future courts.

There are a few different ways that legal precedents can be created. The most common is through case law, which is when a court hands down a ruling in a case that sets a legal precedent. Another way is through legislation, which is when a law is passed by a legislative body that sets a legal precedent.

Precedents are important because they provide a framework for judges to follow when deciding future cases. They also provide clarity and certainty to the law, which can be helpful for both litigants and the general public.

While precedents are important, they are not always perfect. Sometimes they can lead to bad law or result in unfair outcomes. This is why it is important for judges to use their discretion when applying precedent to a particular case.

Table of Contents

What is legal precedent?

Legal precedent is a legal principle that allows a court to make a decision in a case based on the decisions made in previous similar cases. This principle allows the law to be developed incrementally, as new cases are decided and new legal principles are established.

Legal precedent is created in two ways. The first way is when a court issues a decision in a case that sets a new legal principle. This new legal principle is then used to decide future cases that are similar to the original case. The second way legal precedent is created is when a court decides to follow the decision of a previous court in a case that is similar to the original case.

The purpose of legal precedent is to ensure that the law is applied consistently in similar cases. This principle also ensures that the law is developed incrementally, as new cases are decided and new legal principles are established.

The benefits of legal precedent include certainty and predictability. This principle ensures that people know what the law is and how it will be applied in similar cases. The principle of legal precedent also promotes consistency in the application of the law.

There are also some drawbacks to legal precedent. One drawback is that the principle can lead to the development of bad law, which is law that is not based on principle but instead is based on the decisions made in previous cases. Another drawback is that the principle can be used to justify decisions that are not based on the law.

What are examples of legal precedents?

A legal precedent is a legal principle established by a court ruling that is used as a guideline for future court rulings in similar cases. Legal precedents can be created at the national, state, or local level. Some common examples of legal precedents include cases dealing with contract law, property law, torts, and criminal law.

When a court hands down a ruling in a case, that ruling can set a legal precedent for future cases that are similar. In other words, the court’s ruling in the previous case can be used as a guideline for future courts in deciding how to rule in similar cases. This is why it is important for litigants to research past court decisions in order to understand how the courts may rule in their case.

There are a few different types of legal precedents. Stare decisis is a Latin term that refers to the principle of following past court decisions. This means that courts are generally bound by their own previous rulings, and are typically reluctant to overturn previous decisions unless there is a compelling reason to do so.

Precedent authority is another type of legal precedent. This type of precedent is created when a higher court issues a ruling in a case that is then used as a guideline by lower courts in future cases.

Finally, persuasive precedent is a type of legal precedent that is created when a lower court issues a ruling in a case that is then used as a guideline by higher courts in future cases. Persuasive precedent is not binding on higher courts, but it can be persuasive in influencing their decisions.

How is a legal precedent used?

Legal precedent is a legal principle whereby a court’s decision sets a binding example for future cases with similar facts and legal issues. This means that a court’s decision in a previous case will be followed by other courts in similar cases, unless there is a good reason not to do so.

Legal precedent is an important part of the common law legal system, which is used in many countries including the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and Australia. In a common law system, judges rely on legal precedent to make decisions, rather than on statute law (laws enacted by legislatures).

Legal precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis, which is Latin for “to stand by decisions.” This principle means that once a court has made a decision in a particular case, it will be bound by that decision in future cases with similar facts and legal issues.

Legal precedent is not binding on every court. For example, a decision of a High Court (the highest court in a country) will be binding on all lower courts in that country, but a decision of a lower court will not be binding on a higher court.

Legal precedent is also not binding on courts in other countries. For example, a decision of the United States Supreme Court is not binding on the courts in the United Kingdom.

How is a legal precedent used in practice?

When a court is faced with a new case that has similarities to a previous case, it will look at the previous case to see what the court decided. If the court decides to follow the precedent set in the previous case, it will apply the same legal reasoning to the new case.

If the court decides not to follow the precedent set in the previous case, it will need to provide a good reason for doing so. This is known as overturning a precedent. Some of the reasons a court might give for overturning a precedent include that the previous case was decided incorrectly, that the facts of the new case are different, or that the law has changed since the previous case was decided.

What are the benefits of legal precedent?

The main benefit of legal precedent is that it provides certainty and predictability in the law. This is because it ensures that courts will apply the same legal reasoning to similar cases, which helps to avoid inconsistencies in the law.

Another benefit of legal precedent is that it allows for the development of case law, which is the body of law that is created by decisions of courts. Case law is important because it allows lawyers and judges to develop a better understanding of the law and how it should be applied in different situations.

What are the criticisms of legal precedent?

One criticism of legal precedent is that it can lead to unjust decisions. This is because the court may be bound to follow a precedent that is based on an incorrect legal analysis or that is no longer relevant due to changes in the law.

Another criticism of legal precedent is that it can be used to unduly restrict the rights of defendants. This is because the court may be bound to follow a precedent that is based on an overly-broad interpretation of the law.

Finally, some people argue that legal precedent should not be used at all, and that courts should rely on statute law instead. This is because statute law is made by legislatures, which are accountable to the public, whereas precedent is created by courts, which are not accountable to the public.

What are legal precedents quizlet?

A legal precedent is a legal principle established by a court decision. Legal precedents are binding on subsequent courts, unless a higher court overrules them.

There are two types of legal precedents: stare decisis and obiter dicta.

Stare decisis is the principle that a court should follow its own precedents when deciding a case. Obiter dicta is a court’s comments on a case that are not necessary to decide the case. Obiter dicta are not binding on subsequent courts, but they may be persuasive.

Who sets legal precedent?

In the legal system, precedent is a principle that judges use to make decisions. It means that a judge will look at earlier decisions in similar cases to help them make a decision in a current case. Precedent is important because it ensures that the law is consistent and fair.

There are two types of precedent: binding and persuasive. Binding precedent means that a judge must follow the decision in a previous case if it is similar to the current case. Persuasive precedent means that a judge can follow the decision in a previous case, but is not required to do so.

The person who sets legal precedent is the judge in the case. The judge may follow the decision of a previous judge in a similar case, or they may make their own decision. The judge’s decision will set a precedent that other judges must follow in future cases.

What is precedent and its kinds?

Precedent is a principle of law that helps judges make decisions by providing guidance on how similar cases should be handled. Judges rely on precedent to make sure that their rulings are consistent and fair.

There are two main types of precedent: binding and persuasive. Binding precedent is when a court rule or decision is followed in future cases because it is seen as legally binding. Persuasive precedent is when a court rule or decision is followed but is not legally binding.

There are also two main types of precedent: original precedent and appellate precedent. Original precedent is when a court sets a new legal principle by issuing a new ruling. Appellate precedent is when a higher court upholds or overturns a lower court’s ruling.

Precedent is an important part of the legal system because it helps ensure that the law is fair and consistent. Judges rely on precedent to make sure that their rulings are based on established legal principles.

What is the difference between case law and precedent?

There are many differences between case law and precedent, but the most important one is that case law is determined by the specific facts of each individual case, while precedent is determined by the rulings of past cases.

Case law is created when a court issues a ruling in a particular case. The ruling in that case becomes the law for that particular situation, and future courts must follow that ruling when faced with a similar case. This is different from precedent, which is a law or rule that is established by a previous court ruling. Precedent is binding on future courts, which means that they must follow it when ruling on similar cases.

Another difference between case law and precedent is that case law can be overruled by a higher court, while precedent cannot be overruled. For example, if a lower court issues a ruling that is later overturned by a higher court, the lower court’s ruling will no longer be binding on future courts. However, if a higher court issues a ruling that is later overturned by a lower court, the higher court’s ruling will still be binding on future courts.

Finally, case law is more specific than precedent, and it can be applied to only the specific facts of the case. Precedent, on the other hand, can be applied to a wider range of cases. This is because precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis, which means that courts should follow the rulings of past cases whenever possible.

What Are Legal Precedents10 min read