4.01 The Judicial Branch5 min read

The Judicial Branch of the United States federal government is the branch that interprets the law. This includes determining the constitutionality of laws, and settling legal disputes between citizens and the government. The Judicial Branch is made up of the Supreme Court and other federal courts.

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the country. It has nine justices who are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The Supreme Court hears cases that are appealed from lower federal courts, and it has the power to overturn laws that it finds unconstitutional.

There are also a number of lower federal courts, which hear cases that are appealed from state courts. These courts are divided into two systems: the circuit courts and the district courts. The circuit courts are the first level of appeal, and there are thirteen of them. The district courts are the second level of appeal, and there are ninety-four of them.

The Judicial Branch is an important part of the United States government. It ensures that the laws of the country are followed, and it protects the rights of citizens.

What is the role of a judge in a jury trial 4.01 quizlet?

The role of a judge in a jury trial is to preside over the trial and ensure that it is conducted fairly and in accordance with the law. Judges also decide legal questions that arise during the course of the trial, and they may instruct the jury on the law. In some cases, judges also act as jury members.

What is the role of a judge in a jury trial 5 points?

A judge in a jury trial has a few specific roles. First, the judge is responsible for ensuring that the trial is conducted fairly and that the rules of evidence are followed. The judge also decides whether to allow or exclude evidence, and may instruct the jury on the law. Finally, the judge decides whether to accept or reject a jury’s verdict.

What does Article 3 of the Constitution do quizlet?

What does Article 3 of the Constitution do quizlet?

Article 3 of the Constitution sets up the judicial branch of the federal government. This includes the Supreme Court, as well as lower federal courts. The Constitution also establishes the process for appointing judges to these courts.

Which of the following establishes a federal judiciary?

The United States Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, establishes the judicial branch of the federal government. The Constitution also establishes the structure and powers of the federal government. The Constitution is the basis for the laws of the United States.

How is the role of an appointed judge in government different from an elected official?

An appointed judge in government is typically appointed by the president or governor of a state, while an elected official is voted into office by the citizens. Appointed judges have more experience and are typically more qualified than elected officials. However, elected officials are more in touch with the people, as they are directly elected by the people.

Which of the following best describes judicial review?

Judicial review is a process by which courts can determine the constitutionality of laws and government actions. This process allows courts to protect the rights of individuals against the government. Judicial review is a key part of the American system of government, and it helps to ensure that the government is acting within the bounds of the Constitution.

Can judges do whatever they want?

Can judges do whatever they want? This is a difficult question to answer, as there are so many variables to consider. In general, judges are bound by the law and are not allowed to do whatever they please. However, there are some instances in which judges may have a bit more discretion in how they rule.

One of the most important factors to consider when answering this question is the role of a judge. Judges are not legislators; their job is to interpret and apply the law, not create it. This means that they are limited in what they can do. In some cases, judges may have to rule on a case even if they do not agree with the law.

There are also certain limitations on what judges can do based on their jurisdiction. For example, a federal judge may not rule on a case that is within the jurisdiction of a state court.

There are some situations in which a judge may have more discretion in how they rule. For example, a judge may be able to rule on a case that is not specifically covered by the law. In this case, the judge may have to use their own judgement to decide how to rule.

Judges are also allowed to consider the facts of a case when making a ruling. This means that they can take into account things like the harm that has been done, the intentions of the parties involved, and the public interest.

Finally, judges are human, and they may sometimes make rulings that are not based on the law. This can happen for a variety of reasons, such as personal biases or a lack of understanding of the law.

In general, judges are limited in what they can do, and they must rule based on the law. However, there are some situations in which they may have more discretion. Judges must use their judgement in these situations, and they may sometimes make rulings that are not based on the law.