California Judicial Nominees Recommendations5 min read

Reading Time: 4 minutes

YouTube video

The California Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) has released their list of nominees for the California Supreme Court and Court of Appeal. The nominees include experienced judges and attorneys with a wide range of legal backgrounds.

Governor Jerry Brown will now appoint the new justices to the state’s high court and appellate courts. The nominees will undergo a rigorous review process, including interviews and a hearing before the CJP.

The nominees are:

Supreme Court of California

Matthew C. Cooper (Los Angeles)

Justice Marvin R. Baxter (Fresno)

Neal K. Katyal (Washington, D.C.)

Court of Appeal, First Appellate District

Justice Cynthia M. Bashant (San Diego)

Justice Stuart R. Pollak (Los Angeles)

Justice James M. Humes (Fresno)

YouTube video

Justice Jon B. Streeter (San Francisco)

Justice Andrea H. Outdoor(Sacramento)

The California Commission on Judicial Performance (CJP) is an independent, bipartisan commission that evaluates and disciplines judges in California.

How much do judges get paid in California?

How much do judges get paid in California?

Judges in California are paid a salary that is set by the state legislature. The salary varies depending on the level of court and the judge’s years of experience.

For example, a judge in the California state court system with 10 years of experience earns a salary of $200,000 per year. A judge in the California appellate court system with 10 years of experience earns a salary of $225,000 per year.

Read also  Best Legal Jobs For Work Life Balance

Judges in California also receive a number of benefits, including a pension and health insurance.

How does the California judicial selection system differ from that used for federal judges?

The judicial selection system in California is different than the system used for federal judges. In California, judges are appointed by the governor, while in the federal system, judges are appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate.

The California system is also different in that judges must stand for election after serving for a certain amount of time. In the federal system, judges serve for life unless they retire, are impeached, or die.

Finally, the California system is different in that the governor must appoint a judge from a list of three candidates nominated by a judicial selection commission. In the federal system, the president may appoint any qualified person to the federal bench.

YouTube video

What is the Jenny commission?

The Jenny commission is a commission created in 1994 by then-prime minister Jean Chrétien to investigate the financing of political parties in Canada. The commission, named after its chair, businessman and former MP John Jenny, was tasked with examining the various ways in which political parties are funded, and making recommendations on how to improve the system.

The commission released its final report in 1996, making a number of recommendations on how to reform the system of political party financing. These recommendations included capping the amount that individuals and organizations could donate to political parties, and creating a public financing system for political parties.

Many of the commission’s recommendations were eventually implemented, including the creation of a system of public financing for political parties. However, the commission’s recommendations on donation caps were not implemented, and the issue of political party financing remains a controversial topic in Canada.

Read also  Department Of Legal Affairs Florida

Who can appoint individuals to fill vacancies on California courts?

Under the California Constitution, the Governor has the power to appoint individuals to fill vacancies on the California Courts. The Governor must submit a nominee to the State Senate for confirmation. If the State Senate does not confirm the nominee, the Governor must submit a new nominee.

Where do judges get paid the most?

Where do judges get paid the most?

Judges are some of the highest-paid public officials in the United States. According to the National Association of State Judicial Administrators, the average salary for a state trial court judge in 2013 was $140,534. This number reflects the salaries of both elected and appointed judges.

The salaries of federal judges are set by Congress. In 2013, the starting salary for a federal district judge was $178,000. As of October 1, 2014, the salary for a federal appellate judge was $217,600.

Judges’ salaries vary by state. In Texas, for example, the starting salary for a district court judge is $125,000. In New York, the starting salary is $187,000.

YouTube video

So why do judges get paid so much?

There are several reasons. First, judges are responsible for making life-altering decisions. They hear cases involving serious crimes, and they often make decisions that affect the lives of children and families. Second, judges are entrusted with upholding the law and ensuring that justice is served. This is a difficult task, and it requires a great deal of time and expertise. Third, judges are often required to work long hours, and they often face harsh criticism from the public.

Read also  Brass Knuckles Legal In Texas

Despite the high salaries, many judges choose to donate a large portion of their income to charity. In 2013, for example, Texas Supreme Court Justice Nathan Hecht donated more than $600,000 to charity.

How much do CA Superior Court judges make?

How much do CA Superior Court judges make?

On average, California Superior Court judges earn $181,000 per year. However, their pay can vary depending on their years of experience, the county in which they work, and the size of the court.

Some Superior Court judges in California earn as much as $299,000 per year, while others make as little as $123,000 per year. In general, the larger the court, the higher the pay.

Superior Court judges in California are also eligible for a number of benefits, including a pension, health insurance, and paid vacation.

Who is the youngest judge in California?

In the state of California, the youngest judge is 26 years old. Her name is Lauren Dauphin and she was appointed by Governor Jerry Brown in 2016. 

Dauphin was born and raised in Southern California. After graduating from high school, she attended the University of California, Berkeley, where she studied political science. While in college, she worked as an intern for Governor Brown. 

After graduating from college, Dauphin worked as a law clerk for the United States District Court for the Central District of California. She then worked as a staff attorney for the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office. 

In 2016, Governor Brown appointed Dauphin to the Los Angeles County Superior Court. She is currently the youngest judge in California.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *