Electoral College Petition Legitimate10 min read

Reading Time: 7 minutes

YouTube video

A petition to the Electoral College, asking that they cast their votes for Hillary Clinton instead of Donald Trump, has been making the rounds on social media in the days since the election. The petition has been given the legitimacy by some, while others remain unsure of its validity.

The petition, which can be found on the website Change.org, has already garnered over 2.5 million signatures. It asks the Electoral College to “elect Hillary Clinton as the next President of the United States.”

The petition was created on November 10th, the day after the election. It states that “Mr. Trump is unfit to serve” and calls for the Electoral College to “ignore the results of this election and cast their votes for Secretary Clinton.”

The Electoral College is a group of 538 people who cast votes for the President of the United States. The votes are cast based on the results of the popular vote in each state. On December 19th, the Electoral College will cast their votes.

Whether or not the petition will have any impact on the outcome of the election is yet to be seen. It is unclear whether the Electoral College will even consider the petition.

Many people are unsure of the legitimacy of the petition. Some argue that the petition is invalid because it was created after the election. Others argue that the petition does not have the required number of signatures to be considered by the Electoral College.

So far, the petition has not had any impact on the election. It is unclear whether it will have any impact on the outcome of the election.

What are the 3 flaws with the Electoral College?

The Electoral College is a system that is used to elect the President of the United States. It is made up of 538 electors, who are allocated based on the population of each state. A candidate needs to win 270 electoral votes in order to be elected President.

The Electoral College has come under criticism in recent years, with some arguing that it is outdated and flawed. Here are three of the main flaws with the Electoral College:

1. The Electoral College is undemocratic

YouTube video

One of the main criticisms of the Electoral College is that it is undemocratic. It gives more weight to the votes of people in smaller states than to the votes of people in larger states. This is because the number of electors allocated to each state is based on the population of that state, rather than on the number of votes cast.

2. The Electoral College is unfair

Critics also argue that the Electoral College is unfair. It gives more weight to the votes of people in states that are considered to be more conservative than to the votes of people in states that are considered to be more liberal.

Read also  Legal Age For Tobacco

3. The Electoral College is unpredictable

The Electoral College is also seen as being unpredictable. It is possible for a candidate to win the most votes nationwide, but lose the election because they didn’t win enough electoral votes.

What is the most popular proposal for replacing the Electoral College?

There are a number of proposals for replacing the Electoral College. The most popular proposal is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC).

The NPVIC is an agreement between states to award their electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote. The agreement goes into effect once states representing a majority of the electoral votes have signed on. So far, 11 states and the District of Columbia have signed on, representing 165 electoral votes.

The NPVIC has been championed by Democrats, who argue that the Electoral College is undemocratic because it gives more weight to rural, conservative states. Republicans have been more supportive of the Electoral College, arguing that it protects the interests of smaller states.

Other proposals for replacing the Electoral College include the direct election of the president, the electoral vote by congressional district, and the proportional allocation of electoral votes.

Do you think the Electoral College should be abolished Why or why not quizlet?

The Electoral College is a system in the United States used to elect the president and vice president. The system is made up of 538 electors, who cast votes based on the popular vote in their states. A candidate must receive 270 electoral votes to win the election.

YouTube video

The Electoral College has been in place since the early 1800s. It was created as a way to balance the power of large and small states. Some people believe that the Electoral College should be abolished because it is outdated and does not accurately reflect the will of the people. Others believe that the Electoral College is an important part of our democracy and should not be abolished.

Take our poll and let us know what you think!

What does the Constitution say about the Electoral College?

The Constitution does not mention the Electoral College specifically, but there are a few provisions that deal with the topic. The 12th Amendment, ratified in 1804, outlines how the Electoral College works.

The President and Vice President are elected by the Electoral College, which is made up of electors from each state. These electors are chosen by the people of each state, usually through the party process. The number of electors each state gets is based on the number of members of Congress it has.

The electors meet in their respective states to cast their votes for President and Vice President. The votes are then counted and the winner is announced. If no one gets a majority of the votes (270 out of 538), the House of Representatives selects the President from the top three candidates, and the Senate selects the Vice President.

Why does the Electoral College exist?

The Electoral College is a system in the United States of America for electing the president and vice president. The system is a process of indirect election in which citizens who are registered to vote in one of the fifty U.S. states or in Washington, D.C., cast ballots not directly for the president, but instead for members of the Electoral College. These electors then cast direct votes, known as electoral votes, for president. The candidate who receives an absolute majority of electoral votes (at least 270 out of 538, since the Twenty-Third Amendment granted voting rights to citizens of D.C.) is then elected to the presidency, regardless of whether their opponent received more votes from individual citizens.

Read also  Legal Rights Custodial Parent

The Electoral College was created by the Founding Fathers as a compromise between electing the president by popular vote and electing the president by the votes of members of Congress. The U.S. Constitution, as written in 1787, did not specify how the president should be elected. The original system called for the president to be elected by the votes of all of the members of Congress. However, this system was quickly abandoned because it gave too much power to the larger states and did not give equal representation to the smaller states.

The next option considered was to have the president elected by popular vote. However, this system had two major problems. First, it would be possible for the president to be elected by a minority of the population. Second, it would be possible for the president to be elected by people who did not live in the United States. The Electoral College solved both of these problems.

The Electoral College is made up of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is needed to win the presidency. The number of electors per state is based on the number of members of Congress that the state has. The District of Columbia has three electoral votes. Each state has at least three electoral votes. The largest state, California, has fifty-five electoral votes.

The electors meet in their state capitals on the Monday after the second Wednesday in December to cast their votes. The votes are then sent to the president of the Senate, who reads them aloud on January 6, the date set by the Twentieth Amendment to the Constitution as the day that the president-elect is inaugurated.

YouTube video

There are a number of criticisms of the Electoral College. The most common criticism is that the system is undemocratic because it does not give the president to the candidate who receives the most votes from individual citizens. Another criticism is that the system allows for candidates to win the presidency without winning the majority of the popular vote.

Is the Electoral College needed?

The Electoral College is a process, not a place. It is a process for electing the president of the United States. The Constitution gives each state a number of electors equal to the number of its members in the House of Representatives plus one for each of its two senators. The process of the Electoral College begins with the popular vote.

Individuals who want to vote in the Electoral College must first cast a vote for president. They do this by voting for the candidate they want to become president. The individual’s vote for president is counted just like any other vote. However, the votes for the president are not counted until after the votes for the members of the House of Representatives are counted.

Read also  Example Of Legal Positivism

The process of the Electoral College is different in every state. Some states count the votes for the president right away. Other states wait until after the votes for the members of the House of Representatives are counted. The states that count the votes for the president right away always give all of their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the most votes in that state. The states that wait until after the votes for the members of the House of Representatives are counted can give all of their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the most votes in that state or they can split their electoral votes between the two candidates.

The candidates who want to become president must win at least 270 electoral votes. If no candidate wins at least 270 electoral votes, the House of Representatives must choose the president from the top three candidates who received the most electoral votes. The Senate must choose the vice president from the top two candidates who received the most electoral votes.

How many times has the Electoral College tried to be changed?

The Electoral College system has been in place since the early days of the United States, and has been amended and changed a number of times. The Electoral College has been challenged and changed more times than most people realize. In fact, it has been tried to be changed or abolished more than once.

One of the first times that the Electoral College was challenged was in 1804, when Aaron Burr and Thomas Jefferson tied in the election. At the time, the decision was made to allow the House of Representatives to decide the winner, and Burr was eventually declared the winner.

In 1824, John Quincy Adams was elected president, even though he had fewer electoral votes than Andrew Jackson. This was due to the fact that Jackson had won the popular vote, but Adams had won more electoral votes due to the fact that he had won more states.

In 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes was elected president even though he had lost the popular vote. This was due to the fact that he had won more electoral votes, even though he had lost the popular vote by a significant margin.

In 1888, Benjamin Harrison was elected president even though he had lost the popular vote. This was due to the fact that he had won more electoral votes, even though he had lost the popular vote by a significant margin.

In 2000, George W. Bush was elected president even though he had lost the popular vote. This was due to the fact that he had won more electoral votes, even though he had lost the popular vote by a significant margin.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *