Oxford Comma Legal Case

Reading Time: 6 minutes

In 2017, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled in favor of a truck driver who was seeking overtime pay. The court found that the driver should have been paid for the miles he drove after his 10th, rather than his 8th, hour on the clock. This decision hinged on the use of the Oxford comma, which the court found to be instrumental in determining the driver’s eligibility for overtime.

The Oxford comma, also known as the serial comma, is the comma that appears before the last item in a series. For example, “I have a cat, a dog, and two mice.” Many people argue for its use because it can help to avoid ambiguity. In the example above, it’s clear that the speaker has three animals, not two.

In this case, the lack of an Oxford comma created ambiguity. The sentence could be read to mean that the driver had driven for 10 hours, or that he had driven for 10 miles. The court found that because the lack of the Oxford comma led to ambiguity, the driver should be paid for the additional miles he drove.

This ruling is a reminder that the Oxford comma can be an important tool for avoiding ambiguity. While it’s not always necessary to use it, in cases where ambiguity could lead to confusion or misunderstanding, it can be helpful to include it.

Table of Contents

Do legal documents use the Oxford comma?

Do legal documents use the Oxford comma? This is a question that has been asked by many people, and the answer is not a simple one. The Oxford comma, also known as the serial comma, is the comma that is used before the conjunction in a series of items. For example, “I would like to buy a blue, green, and red pen.” Some people believe that the Oxford comma should be used in all instances, while others believe that it should be used only when it is needed for clarity.

So, do legal documents use the Oxford comma? The answer to this question is a bit complicated. In general, legal documents do not use the Oxford comma. However, there are some exceptions to this rule. For example, some states, such as Maine, require the Oxford comma to be used in all legal documents. Additionally, some legal documents, such as contracts, may use the Oxford comma to clarify the meaning of the text.

So, the answer to the question “Do legal documents use the Oxford comma?” is that it depends on the document and the state in which it is being used. However, in general, legal documents do not use the Oxford comma.

How much money was at stake in the recent lawsuit involving a missing Oxford comma?

In a recent lawsuit, a missing Oxford comma cost a dairy company $10 million.

The missing comma was in a Maine state law that said overtime rules didn’t apply to “canning, processing, packinghouse work, or any work in connection with the production of vegetables, fruits, poultry, or dairy products.”

The dairy company, Oakhurst Dairy, argued that the law should exempt its drivers, who spend their days transporting raw milk to a local processing plant. However, the court ruled that the lack of a comma meant the law applied to all types of work, including driver’s jobs.

This was not the first time a missing Oxford comma has caused legal trouble. In a similar case in 2009, a Maine state court ruled that a comma was needed to clarify the law.

Why is the Oxford comma so controversial?

The Oxford comma is the use of a comma before the words “and” or “or” in a list. For example, “I would like to buy a cat, a dog, and a fish” has an Oxford comma, while “I would like to buy a cat, a dog and fish” does not.

The Oxford comma is controversial because some people believe that it is unnecessary, while others believe that it is necessary for clarity. Some people also believe that the Oxford comma can be used to avoid ambiguity. For example, the sentence “I have a cat, a dog, and five fish” could be interpreted as meaning that the person has one cat and five fish, or that they have a cat, a dog, and five separate fish. The sentence “I have a cat, a dog, and five fish, OR two turtles” would be interpreted as meaning that the person has either two turtles or one cat, one dog, and five fish.

Is the Oxford comma unprofessional?

The Oxford comma—also known as the serial comma—is the comma that appears before the coordinating conjunction (usually and or or) in a series of three or more items. For example, “I would like to thank my parents, Elvis Presley, and the aliens who abducted them” would have a serial comma after Elvis Presley.

Proponents of the Oxford comma argue that it is used to prevent ambiguity, particularly when items in a series could be interpreted in more than one way. For example, the sentence “I have a cat, a dog, and two turtles” could be interpreted to mean that the speaker has one cat and two dogs, or three pets in total. However, the sentence “I have a cat, a dog, and two turtles,” with the Oxford comma, would make it clear that the speaker has three pets.

Opponents of the Oxford comma argue that it is unnecessary, and that it can make sentences more confusing. They also argue that it can make writing more formal and stilted.

So, is the Oxford comma unprofessional? It depends on your point of view. Proponents of the Oxford comma argue that it is an important tool for preventing ambiguity. Opponents of the Oxford comma argue that it is unnecessary and can make writing more confusing. Ultimately, it is up to you whether to use the Oxford comma or not.

Are commas used in legal documents?

In general, commas are not used in legal documents. This is because commas can be interpreted in different ways, which could lead to ambiguity. In legal documents, it is important to be precise and clear, so using commas can often lead to confusion.

There are a few exceptions to this rule, however. For example, commas may be used in a list of items, or to separate the day, month, and year in a date. Additionally, commas may be used in a sentence to clarify a point.

Overall, though, commas are not typically used in legal documents. This is because they can lead to ambiguity and confusion, which can be dangerous in legal contexts.

Why do lawyers put two spaces after a period?

In the United States, it is common to put two spaces after a period when typing. But why do lawyers put two spaces after a period?

One reason may be that the double space helps to make the text more readable. When there is only one space after a period, the text can be difficult to read because the spaces between the words are too close together. With two spaces after a period, the text is easier to read because there is more space between the words.

Another reason why lawyers put two spaces after a period may be because that is how they were taught to type. When typewriters were popular, it was common to put two spaces after a period to help make the text more readable. Lawyers may have continued to put two spaces after a period when they started using computers, because that is how they were taught to type.

Some people believe that the two spaces after a period are no longer necessary, because computers can automatically add extra space between the words when the text is printed. However, many people still prefer to put two spaces after a period, because they believe it makes the text more readable.

Why did they get rid of Oxford comma?

The Oxford comma is the use of a comma before the words “and” or “or” in a list of three or more items. For example, “I have eggs, bacon, and toast for breakfast.” Some people believe that the Oxford comma is necessary to make the meaning of a sentence clear. Others believe that it is unnecessary and can be confusing.

In recent years, there has been a movement to remove the Oxford comma from written English. This movement is largely due to the belief that the Oxford comma is unnecessary and can be confusing. Some people argue that it is best to remove the Oxford comma in order to make writing more concise and easy to read.

Oxford Comma Legal Case8 min read