Texas Judicial Election Results 20167 min read

Reading Time: 6 minutes

YouTube video

On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Texans went to the polls to vote in the general election. One of the most important races on the ballot was for the Texas Supreme Court.

Incumbent Justice Jeff Brown faced three challengers in the Republican primary: Debra Lehrmann, Michael Massengale, and Rick Green. Lehrmann emerged as the winner, receiving 41 percent of the vote. Brown came in second with 32 percent, and Massengale and Green received 13 percent and 11 percent, respectively.

Lehrmann will now face Democrat Jim Sharp in the general election. Sharp is a justice on the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth.

The Texas Supreme Court is the state’s highest court. It has nine justices, who are elected to six-year terms.

Are judicial elections in Texas nonpartisan?

Are judicial elections in Texas nonpartisan?

The answer to this question is complicated. Judicial elections in Texas are technically nonpartisan, but there is a lot of speculation that this is not actually the case. There are a few reasons for this. First, many judicial candidates in Texas receive a lot of money from political action committees (PACs). PACs are often affiliated with political parties, so it is reasonable to assume that these donations are not truly nonpartisan. Additionally, many judicial candidates in Texas run as Republicans or Democrats, which suggests that they are not truly nonpartisan. Finally, many Texas voters do not seem to be aware that judicial elections are nonpartisan. In a poll conducted by the Texas Tribune in 2016, only 26% of respondents said that they knew that judicial elections in Texas were nonpartisan.

Despite all of this, it is still technically true that judicial elections in Texas are nonpartisan. However, this does not mean that they are completely fair and unbiased. There is a lot of speculation that political parties still have a lot of influence over Texas judicial elections, and that the candidates who win these elections are not always the most qualified. This is a big problem, and it is something that needs to be addressed.

Read also  Tongue Splitting Legal States

What percentage of all Texas judges are female?

YouTube video

In Texas, there are 853 judges in total. Of those, only 292 (or 34.5%) are female. This is significantly lower than the percentage of female judges in the United States as a whole, which is around 38%. 

There are several factors that may contribute to the lower percentage of female judges in Texas. For one, Texas has a longer history of electing judges, rather than appointing them. This may lead to a less diverse judiciary, as women are less likely to win elections than men. Additionally, Texas has a reputation for being a conservative state, and this may also lead to fewer women being elected to judgeships. 

There are a number of organizations working to increase the number of female judges in Texas. One such organization is the Texas Association of Women Judges, which aims to promote, mentor, and support women judges in the state. 

Despite the lower percentage of female judges in Texas, there are many women who are making a significant impact on the judiciary. Some notable examples include Justice Eva Guzman of the Texas Supreme Court, Judge Barbara Walther of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, and Judge Shannon Bacon of the Dallas County District Court. These women are making a difference in the legal system in Texas, and they serve as excellent role models for future female judges.

Who won Texas electoral votes in 2012?

In the 2012 presidential election, Texas was won by Republican candidate Mitt Romney with a majority of the popular vote and electoral votes. The Republican Party has won Texas in every presidential election since 1988.

How many judges does Texas have highest?

Texas has the most judges in the country, with 254. This is more than twice the number of judges as the next state, California, which has 110 judges. 

The number of judges in Texas has been increasing in recent years. In 2000, there were only 191 judges in the state. The number of judges has increased by about 33% in the past 16 years. 

The reason for the increase in the number of judges is not entirely clear. One possible reason is that the population of Texas has been growing rapidly. The population of Texas grew by more than 20% from 2000 to 2016, and it is projected to grow by another 28% by 2040. 

Read also  What's The Legal Age To Work In Arizona

YouTube video

The number of judges in Texas is also affected by the number of cases that are filed in the state. The number of cases filed in Texas has been increasing in recent years. In 2016, the number of civil cases filed in Texas was more than 1.3 million, which was an increase of more than 50% from 2000. 

The number of criminal cases filed in Texas has also been increasing in recent years. In 2016, the number of criminal cases filed in Texas was more than 330,000, which was an increase of more than 60% from 2000. 

The number of judges in Texas is also affected by the number of judicial vacancies that are available. In 2017, there were 31 judicial vacancies in Texas, which was the highest number in the country. 

The number of judges in Texas is also affected by the number of retired judges that are available. In 2017, there were 107 retired judges in Texas, which was the highest number in the country. 

The number of judges in Texas is likely to continue to increase in the future as the population of Texas continues to grow.

Do you have to have a law degree to be a judge in Texas?

In Texas, a law degree is not required to become a judge. The Texas Constitution simply requires that a judge have “the requisite qualifications” to hold the office. 

Judges in Texas are appointed by the governor, and the governor may choose to appoint a lawyer, a non-lawyer, or a judge with no legal experience. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is the only court in Texas that requires its judges to be lawyers. 

There are many non-lawyer judges in Texas who have been successful in their roles. For example, Judge Barbara Walther presided over the Texas case involving the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (FLDS) and the child custody case of the Yearning for Zion Ranch. 

Some people argue that it is better to have a lawyer as a judge, because they will better understand the law. However, many non-lawyer judges in Texas have shown that they are capable of applying the law in a fair and unbiased manner.

YouTube video

Do you have to be a lawyer to be a county judge in Texas?

In Texas, a person does not have to be a lawyer to be a county judge. However, the person must meet certain qualifications, which are set out in the Texas Constitution.

Read also  Urges El Salvador To Bitcoin Legal

To be eligible to be a county judge, a person must be a United States citizen, at least 25 years old, and have resided in the state for at least five years. The person must also be a qualified voter and have been a resident of the county for at least one year.

The county judge is the chief executive officer of the county and is responsible for the administration of justice in the county. The county judge also presides over the county commissioners court.

Do black judges make a difference?

In the United States, the judiciary is one of the three branches of government, along with the executive and legislative branches. Judges are appointed or elected to their positions and are responsible for interpreting the law and dispensing justice.

One question that has been debated for many years is whether or not black judges make a difference in the courtroom. Some people believe that black judges bring a unique perspective to the bench, while others argue that race should not play a role in the judicial system.

There is no definitive answer to this question, but there is evidence to suggest that black judges can make a difference in the way that justice is administered. One study, which was conducted in Philadelphia, found that black judges were more likely to rule in favor of black defendants than their white counterparts.

This does not mean that black judges are biased against white people, but it does suggest that they are more likely to be sensitive to the unique challenges that black defendants face in the judicial system. Black judges may be more likely to understand the cultural and social context in which a crime took place, and they may be more likely to consider the impact of racism and discrimination on the case.

Black judges can also play a role in encouraging diversity on the bench. When there are more black judges in the courtroom, it sends a message to the public that diversity is important and that everyone is welcome in the justice system.

Ultimately, the role that black judges play in the justice system is still being debated. However, there is evidence to suggest that they can make a difference in the way that justice is administered.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *